Shark Encounters: Why it's time to change 'shark language'
When most people hear the phrase "shark attack," it evokes images of bloodthirsty predators terrorizing humans in the ocean. The word "attack" carries with it a sense of violence, danger, and malicious intent. However, many marine scientists and conservationists are advocating for a shift in language—from "shark attack" to "shark encounter"—in an effort to reshape public perception and promote a more accurate understanding of sharks and their behavior.
This change in terminology is not merely a matter of semantics; it can have a profound impact on how both humans and sharks are treated. In this article, we will explore why using "shark encounter" is not only more accurate but also in the best interests of both humans and the conservation of sharks.
1. Shark Encounters Are Rare and Usually Non-Violent
The phrase "shark attack" creates an exaggerated perception that these incidents are frequent and deadly. In reality, the vast majority of interactions between humans and sharks do not result in injury. Many sharks are naturally curious creatures, and when they do approach humans, it is often out of curiosity or by mistake. Most of these encounters end without harm—sharks swim by, investigate, and leave without any aggressive behavior.
Research shows that of the approximately 70 to 100 reported shark bites globally each year, the vast majority are non-fatal and not predatory in nature. When a shark does bite, it is usually a case of mistaken identity, where the shark confuses a swimmer or surfer for prey such as seals or fish. Once the shark realizes its mistake, it typically retreats. Describing these incidents as "attacks" misrepresents the shark's intentions and contributes to a false narrative of sharks as man-eating predators.
2. 'Attack' Implies Intent, While 'Encounter' Reflects Reality
Language shapes our understanding of the world, and the word "attack" implies intentional harm. However, sharks do not hunt humans. Unlike predators that actively stalk and prey on humans (like certain species of big cats or bears), sharks do not view humans as food. Most species of sharks feed on fish, seals, or smaller marine creatures and have no interest in consuming human flesh, which lacks the fat content they require.
The term "shark encounter" provides a more accurate reflection of what typically happens: a chance meeting between a human and a shark. By shifting the language, we emphasize the unpredictability of these events rather than suggesting that the shark is actively seeking out humans to harm them. This small change helps reduce fear and fosters a better understanding of shark behavior.
3. Reducing Fear Benefits Human Safety
One of the most powerful effects of changing the narrative from "attack" to "encounter" is the potential to reduce irrational fear of sharks. The fear of shark attacks can cause people to take drastic measures, such as shark culling or avoiding the ocean altogether, even though the likelihood of being bitten by a shark is minuscule.
Statistically, the chance of a shark bite is approximately 1 in 11.5 million, far lower than the risk of being struck by lightning or injured in a car accident. However, due to the sensationalism surrounding the word "attack" and its portrayal in the media, many people have an exaggerated sense of the danger posed by sharks. This irrational fear can lead to overreaction, such as shark nets, culling programs, or panic among beachgoers.
By rephrasing these incidents as encounters, we can encourage a more rational perspective on sharks, one that reflects their actual risk to humans. This reduction in fear may also help reduce the number of potentially harmful interactions between people and sharks. When people are informed about how rare and non-lethal these encounters are, they are less likely to react out of panic, improving their own safety as well.
4. Protecting Sharks from Misunderstanding and Harm
The portrayal of sharks as aggressive and dangerous predators has had devastating consequences for shark populations worldwide. Fear-driven campaigns have led to shark culling, where governments intentionally kill sharks in the belief that it will make beaches safer. Unfortunately, such actions often target species that pose little threat to humans and can have serious ecological consequences.
Moreover, the media’s portrayal of sharks as dangerous has contributed to the widespread practice of shark finning, where sharks are killed for their fins to make shark fin soup. Many species of sharks are now endangered due to overfishing and habitat destruction. By perpetuating the myth of the "man-eating" shark, society has justified the mass killing of these vital marine animals.
Switching to the term "shark encounter" can help shift public perception and foster empathy for sharks as misunderstood animals rather than villains. Conservation efforts thrive on education and changing attitudes; by reducing the stigma surrounding sharks, people may become more invested in protecting them.
5. Conservation Requires Positive Public Perception
Sharks play a vital role in maintaining the health of marine ecosystems as apex predators. They regulate populations of other marine species, helping to keep ecosystems balanced. The loss of sharks can lead to cascading effects throughout the food chain, which can ultimately disrupt entire ecosystems.
Efforts to conserve sharks depend on public support, which in turn relies on people understanding the true nature of these creatures. Using fear-based language like "attack" alienates the public from supporting conservation measures. In contrast, using "encounter" helps present sharks as creatures that should be respected, not feared. It opens the door to education about their crucial ecological role and the need to protect them.
6. Fostering Coexistence Between Humans and Sharks
Ultimately, changing the narrative around sharks can help promote peaceful coexistence between humans and sharks. As our understanding of shark behavior grows, so does our ability to coexist with these animals without fear or hostility. Programs that encourage shark-spotting, better management of human-shark interactions, and public education campaigns can help ensure both humans and sharks are safe in the ocean.
By shifting from "shark attack" to "shark encounter," we acknowledge the rare, non-lethal nature of most human-shark interactions and highlight the need for understanding and coexistence rather than fear and reaction.
The phrase "shark attack" misrepresents the reality of shark behavior and fuels unnecessary fear, which in turn has harmful effects on both humans and sharks. By using the term "shark encounter" instead, we not only more accurately describe the nature of these interactions but also help to foster a healthier and more balanced relationship between humans and sharks. This shift in language can reduce fear, protect sharks from harm, and encourage conservation efforts, ultimately benefiting both parties. By promoting a more realistic understanding of sharks, we can work toward a future where humans and sharks can safely share the ocean.
If you would like to write for The Daily Jaws, please visit our ‘work with us’ page
For all the latest Jaws, shark and shark movie news, subscribe to our newsletter and follow The Daily Jaws on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook.